lowest radiation cell phones

Lowest Radiation Cell Phones of 2025 (Low SAR Ratings)

*The information on EMF Academy is for educational purposes only and is not a substitute for professional medical advice. Please review our full Medical Disclaimer for more details. This post may contain affiliate links. Please see my disclosure to learn more.

In this article, I’m going to cover the lowest radiation cell phones, and smartphones, that you can buy in 2025.

Although it isn’t the absolute best measure of a phone’s safety when it comes to EMF radiation exposure, SAR ratings are really our only publicly available means to compare the radiation levels of these devices. So, if you’re looking to find some low-radiation phones, this is the place to be.

So, after we talk about the lowest radiation phones, I’ll go a bit more in-depth about what a SAR Rating is, why it matters, and why it isn’t always the best for determining the safety of a phone.

P.S. If you’re just looking for a great way to protect yourself from the radiation your phone emits, take a moment and watch this video from Aires Tech showing how their product protects the brain from cell phone radiation.

For a limited time, you can get 25% off anything using code EMF25.

Alright, let’s get started!

Lowest Radiation Cell Phones of 2025

This is a comprehensive chart of the lowest radiation cell phones currently available. I’ll do my best to keep it updated as new phones are released and their SAR ratings become available.

RankPhone ModelSAR (W/kg)Carrier Compatibility
1ZTE Blade V100.13Multiple
2Samsung Galaxy S230.16Global
3Mudita Pure0.17Limited availability
4Sony Xperia 5 II0.28Limited in US
5LG V60 ThinQ 5G0.35AT&T, T-Mobile
6LG Wing0.36AT&T, T-Mobile
7Fairphone FP30.39Not compatible in US
8Motorola One Fusion0.40GSM carriers
9Nokia C21 Plus0.40Limited in US
10Google Pixel 5a0.47Global
11Samsung Galaxy A520.49Global
12OnePlus Nord CE0.51GSM carriers
13Nokia G500.53GSM carriers
14Samsung Galaxy S210.56Global
15Motorola Moto E0.58GSM carriers
16Samsung Galaxy S200.59Global
17Huawei P40 Lite0.60Limited in US
18Xiaomi Mi Note 10 Lite0.61Limited in US
19Alcatel 1S0.63GSM carriers
20Apple iPhone 13 Mini0.68Global
21Samsung Galaxy A320.69Global
22ZTE Axon Elite0.71Multiple
23Samsung Galaxy S240.73Global
24Realme X500.75Limited in US
25OnePlus 9 Pro0.76Global
26Google Pixel 6a0.78Global
27Redmi Note 9 Pro0.79Asia, Europe
28Motorola Edge0.80Global
29Apple iPhone SE 20200.82Global
30Samsung Galaxy Note 100.83Global

Lowest SAR Cell Phone / Smartphone

You’ll see from the chart above that the ZTE Blade V10 currently holds the top spot for emitting the lowest amount of radiation of any cell phone. However, this may not be a brand that you’re familiar with.

As you can see from the chart, coming in second place with an absorption rate of just .16 watts per kilogram is the Samsung Galaxy S23. This is by far the lowest radiation smartphone by a major manufacturer.

In fact, Samsung devices hold 11 of the 30 spots for the lowest SAR level.

This leads us to the question:

Why Do Samsung Phones Have Such Low SAR Ratings?

It’s actually a pretty interesting story. It used to be that the FCC mandated that cell phone manufacturers only use antennas that transmitted in all directions, known as omnidirectional antennas.

In 2003 the FCC changed its rule, in part to protect hearing aids from the radiation emitted from the omnidirectional antenna, and no longer required that phone manufacturers use this time of antenna.

Three years after this change, in 2006, Samsung released a new antenna that “enhances handset safety by radiating most of the transmitted RF energy away from the handset user.”

This was not only a transformational upgrade for Samsung, but something brand new to the industry. More importantly, though, it dramatically lowered the recorded SAR ratings of all the phones using this antenna.

If you take a look at the image below, you’ll notice that specific absorption rate tests are done with a model head, and a cellphone held by a machine very close to the ear. This fairly closely replicates how a normal person would use the phone.

A robotic arm is positioned over a life-sized dummy head in a soundproof room, likely simulating a medical or surgical procedure. The background is covered with acoustic foam panels.

They read how much radiation is absorbed by the dummy. Since Samsung’s new antenna directed most of the radiation away from the head, it resulted in far lower SAR ratings.

If you want to see how a small product from Aires Tech can protect the brain from cell phone radiation, click on the video below to see what we’re talking about here in action.

A person sits smiling beside a video demonstration of EEG brain scan comparisons labeled Without Aires and With Aires showing different color patterns.

So Why Don’t Other Phone Manufacturers Do This?

Well frankly, they don’t have to. The regulations only say that you no longer have to use an omnidirectional antenna and that you have to stay under 1.6 w/kg on SAR tests.

So, not only do phone manufacturers not want to put the money into research and development, but they also don’t want to admit that there is even a reason to try and achieve lower SAR ratings.

Alright, we’ve talked a lot about SAR ratings when determining the lowest radiation cell phones on the market, so let’s break this down a bit.

What Are SAR Ratings?

SAR, or specific absorption rate, is simply a measurement of how much EMF radiation human tissue absorbs from a specific phone.

So first, what even is a Specific Absorption Rate?

Well, in short, SAR is a measurement of the rate at which body tissue absorbs EMF radiation from a specific phone.

This measurement is used internationally, with different countries having set different legal minimums.

In the United States, the FCC (Federal Communication Commission) published a set of rules and guidelines in 1996 defining the legal EMF exposure limits.

They decided that no phone sold in the United States could have a SAR rating that exceeded 1.6 w/kg of body weight. So, when tested, the dummy (that represents a person) can’t absorb more than 1.6 watts of radiation for each kg of body weight represented.

The measurements are based on a person holding the phone to their ear for 30 minutes.

Are SAR Ratings A Good Way To Determine Cell Phone Safety?

My short answer is that specific absorption rates are a good way, but probably not the BEST way.

First of all, these SAR standards were set almost 25 years ago, when cell phones, and our understanding of the dangers of EMF radiation, were far different.

Secondly, SAR standards are only designed to protect users from the dangers of the heat generated by microwave radiation. These standards do not account for the non-ionizing radiation that we now know is harmful, especially via long-term exposure.

SAR ratings also don’t really give us a real-world example of the radiation emitted or absorbed, since this will be largely determined by the person using the phone, how the phone is being used, apps on the device, etc.

In fact, the FCC on their website admits that:  cell phones constantly vary their power to operate at the minimum power necessary for communications; operation at maximum power occurs infrequently. Consequently, cell phones cannot be reliably compared to their overall exposure characteristics on the basis of a single SAR value.

I won’t go into any more details if you want to learn tons more about SAR ratings, and how to find the SAR rating of your phone, check out this article.

Alright, now let’s answer a few related questions:

How Can I Check The SAR Rating Of My Phone?

There are quite a few ways to check the SAR Rating of a mobile phone, which is why I wrote this post that outlines 7 different ways.

But my favorite, and the one I use most often, is called the “Quick Code” method. Essentially all phone manufacturers are required to have this code protocol that communicates information about the device to the service provider.

There is quite a bit of information contained, and part of that information is the SAR rating of your particular phone.

To use this method, just follow these simple steps:

  1. Open up your phone like you’re about to make a phone call.
  2. Dial exactly this: *#07#
  3. Press send as if you’re about to call that number, and voila, you’ll be presented with the information.

What Is The Lowest Radiation Apple iPhone?

The lowest radiation iPhone ever sold was the iPhone 16 Pro Max that came out in September of 2024, and had a reported Head SAR rating of 1.01 W/kg. You can reference the chart below for all iPhone SAR ratings.

RankPhone ModelSAR (W/kg)
1iPhone 16 Pro Max1.01
2iPhone 51.06
3iPhone 15 Pro Max1.07
4iPhone X1.08
5iPhone 161.08
6iPhone 7 Plus1.09
7iPhone 8 Plus1.09
8iPhone 16 Pro1.09
9iPhone 71.10
10iPhone 6S Plus1.12
11iPhone 151.12
12iPhone 16 Plus1.13
13iPhone SE (1st Gen)1.14
14iPhone 81.14
15iPhone 111.14
16iPhone 14 Plus1.14
17iPhone 15 Pro1.14
18iPhone 11 Pro1.15
19iPhone 141.15
20iPhone 14 Pro1.15
21iPhone 14 Pro Max1.15
22iPhone XS Max1.16
23iPhone 11 Pro Max1.16
24iPhone 12 Mini1.16
25iPhone 12 Pro1.16
26iPhone 121.17
27iPhone 12 Pro Max1.17
28iPhone 13 Pro Max1.17
29iPhone 3GS1.19
30iPhone 61.18
31iPhone 131.18
32iPhone 6 Plus1.19
33iPhone XS1.19
34iPhone 13 Mini1.19
35iPhone 13 Pro1.20
36iPhone SE (3rd Gen)1.20
37iPhone 41.17
38iPhone 5S1.18

In total, I would say that Apple iPhones have middle-of-the-road cell phone radiation levels, they certainly don’t have the highest, but Samsung and other companies have phones that emit far less radiation.

*September 2023 Update* France just banned the sale of iPhone 12 due to concerns it may emit more than the legal limits of radiation. After a French agency (ANFR) inspected 141 different mobile phones, they discovered that many, including the iPhone 12, exceeded the country’s maximum specific absorption limit. Other countries may follow suit as this move reignites mainstream discussion over the dangers of EMF radiation.

If you are going to go with an iPhone, I’d recommend considering a quality EMF protection cell phone case.

What Is The Lowest Radiation Samsung Phone?

The Samsung phone with the lowest SAR rating is the Samsung Galaxy Note 8 with a rating of just .17 W/kg.

What Is The Lowest Radiation LG Smartphone?

Currently, the LG Exalt has the lowest SAR rating of any LG phone, at just .43 W/kg.

What Is The Lowest Radiation Google Pixel?

The lowest radiation Google Pixel phone is the Pixel XL, which had a specific absorption rate of .56 watts per kilogram when tested on the head.

On Head (USA)

  • Pixel XL – 0.56 W/kg
  • Pixel – 0.8 W/kg
  • Pixel 8 – 0.99 W/kg
  • Pixel 8 Pro – 1.02 W/kg
  • Pixel 1 – 0.89 W/kg
  • Pixel 2 – 1.14 W/kg
  • Pixel 3a XL – 1.16 W/kg
  • Pixel 5a – 1.16 W/kg
  • Pixel 7 Pro – 1.17 W/kg
  • Pixel 4a – 1.18 W/kg
  • Pixel 3a – 1.18 W/kg
  • Pixel 7 – 1.19 W/kg
  • Pixel 4 – 1.2 W/kg
  • Pixel 4a 5G – 1.2 W/kg
  • Pixel 2 XL – 1.18 W/kg
  • Pixel 6a – 1.58 W/kg
  • Pixel 7a – 1.58 W/kg
  • Pixel 4 XL – 1.35 W/kg
  • Pixel 3 XL – 1.35 W/kg
  • Pixel 6 – 1.45 W/kg

What Is The Lowest Radiation Motorola Phone?

The lowest radiation cell phone made by Motorola would be the Motorola X4 with a SAR level of 1.12 W/kg when measured on the head.

However, Motorola phones all have fairly similar SAR levels, ranging from 1.12 W/kg to 1.26 W/kg.

The Motorola Edge that was released in 2020 has a SAR of just .81 W/kg

What Is The Lowest Radiation Nokia Smartphone?

Nokia’s old “brick” phones emitted fairly low levels of cell phone radiation. However, among the modern Nokia smartphones, the Nokia 1 has the lowest radiation with a head SAR of .8 W/kg, tied with the Nokia 5 which also had a head SAR of .8 W/kg.

The Nokia Lumia 620 and 830 also have SAR limits under .9 W/kg.

Will Extremely Low Radiation Cell Phones Be Released?

Several companies are working on releasing cell phones specifically designed to have low radiation levels. One in particular that I’m extremely excited about, and have pre-ordered, is the Mudita Pure. I should write a full review of the product, but for now, I’ll just say that it was developed with the dangers of EMF radiation in mind.

In fact, the Mudita Pure has a head SAR of just .06 W/kg, which I believe would make it the lowest radiation phone released, at least that still has modern smartphone features.

Not only will the Mudita Pure have unbelievably low radiation levels, but it’s also specifically designed to reduce your use and reliance on phones.

Will 5G Cellphones Emit More EMF Radiation?

The discussion on how much 5G will impact us I’ll leave for my other articles on the topic. However, if we’re just looking at the specific absorption rate of these other phones, and whether they have high or low radiation levels, then essentially the answer is no, 5G phones don’t have particularly high SAR levels.

Let’s look at some of the most popular 5G phones as well as their radiation levels:

5G Cell Phone Radiation (SAR) Levels (USA Head Readings)

  • Apple iPhone 15 Pro Max – 1.07 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 14 Pro Max – 1.15 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 13 Pro Max – 1.18 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 13 – 1.18 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 12 Pro Max – 0.98 W/kg
  • Apple iPhone 12 Pro – 0.99 W/kg
  • Samsung Galaxy S24 Ultra – 1.26 W/kg
  • Samsung Galaxy S23 Ultra – 1.12 W/kg
  • Samsung Galaxy S21 Ultra – 0.71 W/kg
  • Samsung Galaxy Note 20 – 0.71 W/kg
  • Google Pixel 8 Pro – 1.12 W/kg
  • Google Pixel 7 Pro – 1.17 W/kg
  • Google Pixel 6a – 1.58 W/kg

As you can see, many of these 5G phones have somewhat low SAR levels. So, then you just have to decide through your own research how much you believe having a 5G phone may affect you.

How Can I Reduce My Exposure To Cell Phone Radiation?

I don’t want to go too deep into this topic, because I wrote a hugely comprehensive guide on reducing your exposure to cell phones that you can check out.

I literally outline 17 different ways you can reduce your exposure, with detailed steps on how to do it.

However, one of the absolute best things you can do is to get a quality EMF protection case for your phone. I’m currently using (and loving) this one from Defendershield.

It’s also really, really, important that you have a quality EMF meter, like the Trifield TF2. Not only will this let you accurately measure the EMF radiation from your cell phone, and determine just how low, or high, that radiation is, but it will also be crucial in any EMF mitigation you attempt.

If you’ve noticed throughout my articles, I often recommend this, because, without a good EMF meter, you won’t be able to find the sources of radiation or know if what you are doing to reduce it is even helping.

Final Thoughts

Alright, now that we’ve exhausted the topic of “lowest radiation mobile phones,” I hope you have a much clearer understanding of:

  • Which phones have low radiation
  • How we determine which phones emit the least radiation
  • What SAR ratings are
  • And so much more.

If you enjoyed this guide, do me a favor and share it!

A display of various smartphones mounted on stands with the text Your Guide to the Safest Cell Phones of 2025 and emfacademy.com below.

Similar Posts

3 Comments

  1. John Flano says:

    Awesome info. Where is the article about the scientist who got fired… I think…. For publishing…. Or posting… How cell companies do not really test for EMF on real people??….. Please understand that i may not be recalling it all correctly here…. Just a scientist being fired by Samsung or Apple….. and maybe a different article.. Or the same… The actual test that is used to determine how safe it is in the USA and maybe worldwide….. A model of a humans head as you showed above… But didn’t they use a grapefruit or Mellon or something to determine the temp of the microwaves??…. I can’t remember where I read all this. Anyway, I totally love that you are doin this research and informative posts to help spread the word around. Thank you very much. ? ?

  2. Kati Kuosmanen says:

    Thank You very much of all this information. It is hugely important. Safety on any device should be most important matter when buying phones or other devices.
    The code *#07# did not work on my phone Samsung Galaxy J5 (2016 model).
    Peace&Love from Finland!
    ??????✌

    1. Thanks so much for the kind words!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *